Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Public Comment: 63 (Margaud Dieffenbacher) #63

Open
ncx-gitbot opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Public Comment: 63 (Margaud Dieffenbacher) #63

ncx-gitbot opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
miscellaneous public comment

Comments

@ncx-gitbot
Copy link
Contributor

Commenter Organization: La Belle Forêt

Commenter: Margaud Dieffenbacher

2021 Deferred Harvest Methodology Section: 5

Comment: Why not take into account the below-ground biomass ? As said in the method, the carbon sequestrated in this pool is likely to increase due to the project activity. Wouldn't it allow to sell more CO2 tonnes ?

Proposed Change: No Proposed Change
@ncx-gitbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

NCX response: We are conservatively excluding belowground biomass from our projects for now since the allometric equations for BGB are much more uncertain than for AGB. We support research into this area to better understand BGB since it can be significant pool of carbon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
miscellaneous public comment
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ncx-gitbot