Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SilverStripe 4 Compatibility #7

Open
nicole-ashley opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

SilverStripe 4 Compatibility #7

nicole-ashley opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@nicole-ashley
Copy link

Hey there, any plans on upgrading this for SilverStripe 4? I know it's early but I'm trying to start migrations as soon as possible.

@nathancox
Copy link
Owner

Probably at some point but there are no immediate plans sorry. I haven't had enough of a chance to have a look at the changes to the CMS code and TinyMCE in SS 4 yet.

@iqmeckert
Copy link

Any update on SS4 compatibility? It looks like it's all been updated, but composer is requiring silverstripe/admin:4.* it should be silverstripe/framework:4.*

@nathancox nathancox self-assigned this Jan 11, 2018
@nathancox
Copy link
Owner

Sorry everybody this is getting held up by me trying to get a chance to figure out how modals work in SS4.

@mikenz
Copy link

mikenz commented Jan 15, 2018

@iqmeckert in the mean time feel free to use my fork at https://github.com/mikenz/silverstripe-codeeditorfield which we use in production with SS4 already. Once @nathancox's finished their migration I'll bring my fork inline then we can switch back.

@divinity76
Copy link

any update to SS4 compatibility? (4 years later)

@kevingroeger
Copy link

@nathancox hey! Don't want to bother you - there are probably reasons that you didn't come back to this.

But could you consider updating this repo? This is - by far - still the best CodeEditorField available for Silverstripe. It would be great if you could upgrade it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants