You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why focus on getting browsers and OS’s to support Namecoin instead of getting ISP’s or public DNS resolvers (e.g. Google DNS) to do so?
Why focus on browser add-ons and OS packages instead of native browser and OS support?
Why focus on getting existing browsers and OS’s to support Namecoin instead of forking those browsers and OS’s?
Is Namecoin’s support of atomic name trades a feature primarily aimed at squatters?
This includes two (to me) disparate parts:
Why is Namecoin technologically designed in this or that way?
Why is the Namecoin community run in this or that way?
It seems like it'd make more sense to move the "why focus on..." questions to a new section called "Project", that would be about "philosophical" matters. It could also address questions like "why no trademark deletions" etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, section "Design" looks like this:
This includes two (to me) disparate parts:
It seems like it'd make more sense to move the "why focus on..." questions to a new section called "Project", that would be about "philosophical" matters. It could also address questions like "why no trademark deletions" etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: