From bb92144717373670bbbe11b5f0c562e3d7c008a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mrdudz Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 16:21:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] changed "inline assembler statement" to "inline assembler expression" as suggested in #2191 --- doc/cc65.sgml | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/cc65.sgml b/doc/cc65.sgml index e1e9214e59..6d036c1499 100644 --- a/doc/cc65.sgml +++ b/doc/cc65.sgml @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ This cc65 version has some extensions to the ISO C standard. - The compiler allows to insert assembler statements into the output + The compiler allows to insert assembler expressions into the output file. The syntax is @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ This cc65 version has some extensions to the ISO C standard. The first form is in the user namespace; and, is disabled if the .

@@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ bloated code and a slowdown. Inline assembler

-The compiler allows to insert assembler statements into the output file. The +The compiler allows to insert assembler expressions into the output file. The syntax is @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ or The first form is in the user namespace; and, is disabled by if the argument is not Note: Do not embed the assembler labels that are used as names of global -variables or functions into your int foo;