Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using ReBench for executioner #4

Open
qinsoon opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Consider using ReBench for executioner #4

qinsoon opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@qinsoon
Copy link
Member

qinsoon commented Jul 14, 2020

Currently we are using the running script (https://github.com/mmtk/running/tree/rust-mmtk) for configuring runs and executing benchmarks. However, there are some limitations of the running script, such as:

  • It is designed for executing Java benchmarks, we probably cant use it for Javascript benchmarking.
  • It assumes heap size for each benchmark and we can't set heap size for each build.
  • It assumes the same iteration/invocation for all the benchmarks. We may want to run certain benchmarks with more invocations/iterations to get more reliable results.

We may consider using ReBench (https://github.com/smarr/ReBench). That is used by SOM across multiple SOM implementation. We need to investigate to see if ReBench is suitable.

@qinsoon qinsoon changed the title Consider using ReBench Consider using ReBench for executioner Jul 14, 2020
@qinsoon
Copy link
Member Author

qinsoon commented Sep 27, 2020

#19 adds microbenchmarks with ReBench. We are still using running script for dacapo benchmarks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant