Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More derived units and base imperial units #29

Open
mkhan45 opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

More derived units and base imperial units #29

mkhan45 opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mkhan45
Copy link
Owner

mkhan45 commented Feb 23, 2021

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_units - I don't want abbreviations for these

https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html

@mkhan45 mkhan45 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 23, 2021
@mkhan45
Copy link
Owner Author

mkhan45 commented Feb 24, 2021

Started in 243d369

@mkhan45
Copy link
Owner Author

mkhan45 commented Mar 31, 2021

Turns out imperial units suck more than expected

@fabianlischka
Copy link

Personally, I think Imperial and US units should be relegated to the past...

I noted that you added Pascal, but it doesn't seem to work yet?
Line 21: Pa is not a variable or a valid unit

@mkhan45
Copy link
Owner Author

mkhan45 commented Apr 28, 2021

Personally, I think Imperial and US units should be relegated to the past...

I'm definitely starting to agree

I noted that you added Pascal, but it doesn't seem to work yet?

This is fixed by 09d9ded; it should be live on calcula.tech in the next hour. Thanks for the report!

@mkhan45
Copy link
Owner Author

mkhan45 commented May 30, 2021

User defined units should also be a thing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants