Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LCAM 856 Increase Sentry Sample Rate in Production #61

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

nigelpain
Copy link
Contributor

@nigelpain nigelpain commented Aug 16, 2023

What

Link to story

Configured sample rate so it will pull the appropriate value defined in the environment value file and also bumped the sample rate for production up to 100% (kept the rest at 5%).

Checklist

Before you ask people to review this PR:

  • Tests should be passing: ./gradlew test
  • Github should not be reporting conflicts; you should have recently run git rebase main.
  • Avoid mixing whitespace changes with code changes in the same commit. These make diffs harder to read and conflicts more likely.
  • You should have looked at the diff against main and ensured that nothing unexpected is included in your changes.
  • You should have checked that the commit messages say why the change was made.

@nigelpain nigelpain requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2023 11:06
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 17, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@nigelpain nigelpain merged commit d4afdab into main Aug 17, 2023
5 checks passed
@nigelpain nigelpain deleted the lcam-856-increase_sentry_sample_rate branch August 17, 2023 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants