Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should blt-lando require acquia/blt-behat? #39

Open
ssu-carlsoni opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Should blt-lando require acquia/blt-behat? #39

ssu-carlsoni opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ssu-carlsoni
Copy link

ssu-carlsoni commented Nov 3, 2022

Given that https://github.com/acquia/blt-behat states:

This plugin is provided solely as a backwards-compatible shim for customers upgrading from BLT 11. We recommend that anyone implementing new tests on a Drupal project use PHPUnit instead of Behat.

Should blt-lando require acquia/blt-behat?

I'm working on a new D9 project using Lando, BTL, GitLab pipeline, and hosting on Acquia and trying to figure out our automated testing strategy. At the moment I've worked around blt-land inclusion of behat by adding the following to my blt.yml.

disable-targets:
  tests:
    behat:
      run: true
@mikemadison13
Copy link
Owner

I was actually just considering this, as the behat plugins aren't d10 ready yet (so if you want to pull down this plugin you can't do so for d10). I'll be making a determination soon. I'm hoping that the behat changes I've been working on behind the scenes get merged elsewhere to help unblock!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants