Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export "as JSON" from FastPass #5677

Open
jsnmrs opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 11 comments
Open

Export "as JSON" from FastPass #5677

jsnmrs opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 11 comments
Labels
feature request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@jsnmrs
Copy link

jsnmrs commented Jun 27, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I noticed that "Export result" options differ depending on whether you're coming from a FastPass or an Assessment.

Describe the desired outcome

Export "as JSON" option available when exporting results from FastPass.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I could run a full assessment and only include programmatic tests to achieve a similar result, but it's a few extra clicks.

Additional context

I want to feed FastPass results into a dashboard showing results across many URLs. JSON would be the ideal format for that workflow.

FastPass export result modal screen

Assessment export result modal screen

@ghost ghost added the status: new This issue is new and requires triage by DRI. label Jun 27, 2022
@ghost ghost assigned sfoslund Jun 27, 2022
@sfoslund sfoslund removed their assignment Jun 28, 2022
@sfoslund sfoslund added status: ready for triage This issue is ready to be triaged by the Accessibility Insights team. and removed status: new This issue is new and requires triage by DRI. labels Jun 28, 2022
@ghost ghost assigned ferBonnin Jun 28, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 28, 2022

This issue has been marked as ready for team triage; we will triage it in our weekly review and update the issue. Thank you for contributing to Accessibility Insights!

@ferBonnin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jsnmrs thanks for the feature request! we have a couple of questions:

  • Can you please tell us more about your scenario?
  • FastPass consists of 3 steps, are you looking for the results of automated checks only or also needs review and tab stops (asking because from the workaround you mentioned we are not clear if its all 3 steps) ?

@ferBonnin ferBonnin added the status: needs author feedback This issue requires additional information from the issue author. label Jul 11, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 11, 2022

The team requires additional author feedback; please review their replies and update this issue accordingly. Thank you for contributing to Accessibility Insights!

@ghost ghost removed the status: ready for triage This issue is ready to be triaged by the Accessibility Insights team. label Jul 11, 2022
@jsnmrs
Copy link
Author

jsnmrs commented Jul 15, 2022

Hi @ferBonnin — sure thing!

Scenario-wise, I hope to have support staff run a FastPass on a URL and optionally complete the tab stop review. If there are "needs review" items, they would also be optional. We would take the JSON report for that URL and feed it into a dashboard that shows FastPass results over time. These reduced scans will supplement our less frequent, complete assessments.

Ideally, the JSON output would match the HTML export, regardless of which of the three FastPass steps are complete. For example, if someone only ran the automated checks, the tab stops would be listed as "incomplete."

FastPass HTML export example with tab stops marked as incomplete.

Does that clarify a bit?

@ghost ghost added status: needs attention The author has provided additional feedback and now requires attention. and removed status: needs author feedback This issue requires additional information from the issue author. labels Jul 15, 2022
@ferBonnin ferBonnin added status: ready for triage This issue is ready to be triaged by the Accessibility Insights team. and removed status: needs attention The author has provided additional feedback and now requires attention. labels Jul 15, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 15, 2022

This issue has been marked as ready for team triage; we will triage it in our weekly review and update the issue. Thank you for contributing to Accessibility Insights!

@ferBonnin ferBonnin added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 25, 2022
@ferBonnin
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the additional information on your scenario @jsnmrs. After reviewing with the team, we have added this to the backlog and marked it as help wanted. We would be happy to take on a community contribution for this feature request!

@ferBonnin ferBonnin removed the status: ready for triage This issue is ready to be triaged by the Accessibility Insights team. label Jul 25, 2022
@jsnmrs
Copy link
Author

jsnmrs commented Jul 27, 2022

Much appreciated! Thanks @ferBonnin

@Pranav-yadav
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ferBonnin !
Any status on this?

I can help with this one; if not already assigned to anyone :)

PS: Though, Jason has explained the expected behavior very well, how this need to be approached programmatically?
Will have a look at the respective code, soon..

@DaveTryon DaveTryon moved this from Needs Triage to Help Wanted in Accessibility Insights Jun 26, 2023
@DaveTryon DaveTryon moved this from Help Wanted to Old backlog in Accessibility Insights Jun 28, 2023
@DaveTryon
Copy link
Contributor

@Pranav-yadav, please feel free to submit a PR on this

@DaveTryon DaveTryon moved this from Old backlog to Help wanted in Accessibility Insights Jul 14, 2023
@Pranav-yadav
Copy link
Contributor

It's great that this issue is being revived after almost A YEAR.
I actually don't have much time to work on this.
Thanks.

@JunkParticleLander
Copy link

Watching this one. Could really help as we are testing multiple sites.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Status: Help wanted
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants