You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know how many databases support atomic operations, but it might make sense to move the atomicity requirement to the adapters. That way if a database supports atomic operations the core doesn't do any unnecessary work.
This probably depends quite highly on #19, as this is hard to write and prove without a good test suite if the database does not have atomic operations. We could also provide a wrapper to make generic, non-atomic put operations atomic to make that step easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know how many databases support atomic operations, but it might make sense to move the atomicity requirement to the adapters. That way if a database supports atomic operations the core doesn't do any unnecessary work.
This probably depends quite highly on #19, as this is hard to write and prove without a good test suite if the database does not have atomic operations. We could also provide a wrapper to make generic, non-atomic
put
operations atomic to make that step easier.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: