Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

multiple-mappers ranking #15

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

multiple-mappers ranking #15

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Hi,

I'd like to rank multiple-mappers based on the alignment quality.

following the manual, I can distinguish the secondary multi mappers from the 
primary

"For multi-mappers, all alignments except one are marked with 0x100 (secondary 
alignment) in the FLAG column 2. The un-marked alignment is either the best one 
(i.e. highest scoring), or is randomly selected from the alignments of equal 
quality."


is there a way I could rank the secondary multi mappers?


best,



M.



Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 3 Feb 2014 at 6:17

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Please post your questions in the STAR forum 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/rna-star for a faster reply.

The alignment score, recorded as AS attribute in the Aligned.out.sam file, can 
be used to rank the multiple alignments.

Original comment by [email protected] on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:29

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant