Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Journal prediction should flag relevance #191

Open
ardunn opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Journal prediction should flag relevance #191

ardunn opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
backend Requires changes on the backend not directly solved by unibox Issue is unrelated to or not superceded by unibox

Comments

@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor

ardunn commented Feb 13, 2020

There is no relevance warning for nonsense journal predictions:

The analysis on "Not a real abstract" is:

[['Mathematical and Computer Modelling', 0.7567519545555115], ['Biometric Technology Today', 0.7155683636665344], ['Journal of Materials Science Letters', 0.7097627520561218], ['Applied Mathematics and Computation', 0.6746547222137451], ['IFAC-PapersOnLine', 0.6410911083221436], ['Annual Reviews in Control', 0.6306076049804688], ['Oral Oncology Extra', 0.6169986128807068], ['Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence', 0.6154762506484985], ['Computers in Industry', 0.6138418912887573], ['European Journal of Control', 0.6119754910469055]]

No relevance field is found.

Once the backend has this working, should take ~5min on the frontend

@ardunn ardunn added backend Requires changes on the backend not directly solved by unibox Issue is unrelated to or not superceded by unibox labels Feb 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend Requires changes on the backend not directly solved by unibox Issue is unrelated to or not superceded by unibox
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants