You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the folder size of results, the read-only-kmers account a large proportion of progeny's kmers. Which means the origin of these DNA sequences are unknown.
In my opinion, the DNA of progeny should be inherited from mat or pat, why there exists a large proportion of unknown DNA sequences, and what is the probable reason?
Very hope for your reply. Thanks very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I get the final plot, I'm not clear with each filled region in the plot, and I want to understand why the read-only-kmers account for a large proportion. Looking forward to your reply.
Following the advice of marbl/meryl#53 (comment), I tried
hapmers.sh
ofmerqury
, and I got the following results:According to the folder size of results, the read-only-kmers account a large proportion of progeny's kmers. Which means the origin of these DNA sequences are unknown.
In my opinion, the DNA of progeny should be inherited from mat or pat, why there exists a large proportion of unknown DNA sequences, and what is the probable reason?
Very hope for your reply. Thanks very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: