-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
👀👀 [Request for Review] #1
Comments
Nice @lshpaner ! |
@coblee This is for a pending open-source Python library (main.py) that I would like to upload to PyPI. It gives users flexibility to simulate Litecoin user growth over a period of time into the future given BTC hashrate and some other cool plots. Please review functions and white paper and let me know what you all think. Thanks!!! |
@lshpaner Wow! I read the white paper. That's amazing and looks so cool! I have questions.
Thank you! |
@josikie Thank you for the feedback! What is stochastic processes? A stochastic process is a mathematical concept used to describe systems that evolve over time in a way that involves randomness or uncertainty. Unlike deterministic processes, where the future state of the system is entirely predictable given its current state, stochastic processes incorporate elements of chance. Example What is stochastic noise? Example Quick Summary Stochastic Process: A system that evolves over time with inherent randomness. |
Very impressive. Where is the visualisation? |
@wangxinxi Thank you! As of right now, in the readme file: https://github.com/litecoin-foundation/litecoin_analytics/blob/main/README.md I can, however, create a jupyter notebook which will essentially be the same demo. |
Is there any strong correlation between hash rate and active users? |
I went ahead and created new class for correlating actual LTC data with bitcoin hashrate --> If we are to look at only last 3 months worth of user data (based on active LTC user addresses from If we cast a wider net and do a look back from January 1, 2023 through January 1, 2024, the correlation increases by a whopping 42%: That being said, below is the correlation between median predicted users and BTC hashrate (I added this as a feature inside the updated Given, as inputs: initial_users=1000,
carrying_capacity=100000,
base_growth_rate=0.10,
time_steps=365,
num_simulations=1000, Correlation between hash rate and median user growth: 0.9235 Predicted Year over Year Growth
Predicted Quarterly Growth
|
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: