We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Based on my understanding of https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2020Jun/0006.html
It is not possible to have distinct rdf-star statements that use the same core triple; these are collapsed
This presents problems with layering owlstar on rdfstar. e.g. if we have
A sub R some B
A sub R only B
The intent of owlstar is that we have two separate statements:
1 <<A R B>> os:interp allsome 2 <<A R B>> os:interp allonly
<<A R B>> os:interp allsome
<<A R B>> os:interp allonly
Each of these could have distinct provenance associated with them
However, this may have been a mistaken interpretation of rdf-star, as it seems 1 and 2 are collapsed
And thus collapsing any provenance associated with them
A workaround is to introduce an extra level of quoting but this is not ideal
See also w3c/rdf-star#199
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Based on my understanding of
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2020Jun/0006.html
It is not possible to have distinct rdf-star statements that use the same core triple; these are collapsed
This presents problems with layering owlstar on rdfstar. e.g. if we have
A sub R some B
A sub R only B
The intent of owlstar is that we have two separate statements:
1
<<A R B>> os:interp allsome
2
<<A R B>> os:interp allonly
Each of these could have distinct provenance associated with them
However, this may have been a mistaken interpretation of rdf-star, as it seems 1 and 2 are collapsed
And thus collapsing any provenance associated with them
A workaround is to introduce an extra level of quoting but this is not ideal
See also w3c/rdf-star#199
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: