You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i.e. have it map the final units over the preceding numbers. Or, even better, if the final 3 had no units but it could still detect a 3D dimension specification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @Zylatis, the current quantity model, in theory, should be able to recognize the three measurements. In reality it does not recognize all of them, because I guess this example is quite different.
What is your goal? Just extract 3d dimentions? Do you have the possibility to create some training data?
If so maybe the best solution would be to have a separate model just to solve this problem.
Is it possible to parse something like this?
"hi need to ship a 3 by 3 by 3m carton"
i.e. have it map the final units over the preceding numbers. Or, even better, if the final 3 had no units but it could still detect a 3D dimension specification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: