Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Since + duration = interval or not? #63

Open
everzeni opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Since + duration = interval or not? #63

everzeni opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@everzeni
Copy link
Collaborator

everzeni commented Mar 2, 2018

We had a few cases for which we couldn't really decide if they are intervals or values:

  • the mechanical oscillator method is well established since about 2 decades
  • Over the past three decades

We hesitated:

the mechanical oscillator method is well established since about <measure type="interval"><num atMost="2">2</num> <measure type="TIME">decades</measure></measure>
or
the mechanical oscillator method is well established since about <measure type="value"><num>2</num> <measure type="TIME">decades</measure></measure>

Over the past <measure type="interval"><num atMost="3">three</num> <measure type="TIME">decades</measure></measure>
or
Over the past <measure type="interval"><num atMost="3">three</num> <measure type="TIME">decades</measure></measure>

It seems to me that if we were to annotate those as intervals, we should bound them with the date corresponding to the beginning of the time periods. For examples 1998 for since about 2 decades, but it would be complicated to decide the starting point to compute the duration from... the publication of the article?

I think we should annotate them as atomic values, what do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant