You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should increase unit test coverage of data_utils to establish a benchmark of functionality before attempting any refactoring, such as proposed in #17. 95% or greater coverage would be a strong basis to shoot for.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cisaacstern
changed the title
Increase unit test coverage of data_utils
Increase unit test coverage of data_utils to > 95%
Aug 18, 2023
Our current test coverage of
climsim_utils.data_utils
is 12%, as seen here:That is not surprising because our only test is a smoke test for importability:
ClimSim/tests/test_data_utils.py
Lines 5 to 6 in f7d092c
We should increase unit test coverage of
data_utils
to establish a benchmark of functionality before attempting any refactoring, such as proposed in #17. 95% or greater coverage would be a strong basis to shoot for.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: