-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(AlgebraicTopology): define the simplicial nerve of a simplicial category #19837
Conversation
PR summary 213c7fbc1dImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
-- Even though `NatTrans.comp_app` is a `@[simp]` lemma, `simp` is unable to prove this. | ||
-- Why is this? | ||
-- Do we want `SSet.comp_app` as a global `@[simp]` lemma? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can simp
prove this if you pass it SSet.comp_app
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is SSet.comp_app
. My question was meant as "do we want this as a simp lemma?".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤦 -- sorry for reviewing while my mind was foggy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyways, simp
does not realize that f
and g
are natural transformations, because that fact is hidden behind one layer of definitions. So I agree that it would be good to make this lemma a simp-lemma.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, modulo the simp question.
bors d+
-- Even though `NatTrans.comp_app` is a `@[simp]` lemma, `simp` is unable to prove this. | ||
-- Why is this? | ||
-- Do we want `SSet.comp_app` as a global `@[simp]` lemma? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyways, simp
does not realize that f
and g
are natural transformations, because that fact is hidden behind one layer of definitions. So I agree that it would be good to make this lemma a simp-lemma.
|
||
-- This is to improve automation throughout this file, because `simp` doesn't apply | ||
-- `NatTrans.comp_app` to morphisms of simplicial sets. | ||
attribute [local simp] SSet.comp_app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed in the other thread, I think we can make it a global simp lemma
✌️ dagurtomas can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors merge |
…category (#19837) This PR defines the simplicial (/homotopy coherent) nerve of a simplicial category.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
This PR defines the simplicial (/homotopy coherent) nerve of a simplicial category.
Eventually, this will be used to define the infinity-category of anima.