Merge branch 'develop' into renamekeys

build.lua

@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ checkengines = {"pdftex","luatex","pdftexmain"}
 
 -- forcecheckruns=true
 
+checkconfigs = {
+                 "build",
+                 "config-pdftex",
+                 "config-luatex",
+                  }
 
 
 checkruns = 2

testfiles-luatex/test-mc-user.tlg

@@ -202,7 +202,10 @@ Package tagpdf Warning: tag TAB is not known
 Package tagpdf Warning: Parent-Child 'Document/' --> 'MC (realcontent)'.
 (tagpdf)                Relation is not allowed (struct 1, /Document) on line ...
 [1
-] [2] [3] [4]
+]
+[2]
+[3]
+[4]
 The sequence \g__tag_struct_kids_0_seq contains the items (without outer braces):
 >  {9 0 R}.
 <recently read> }

testfiles-luatex/test-struct-user.tlg

@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ Completed box being shipped out [1]
 ...\marks4{e+,1,3,}
 ...\write1{\new@label@record{mcid-2}{{tagabspage}{\__property_code_tagabspage: }{tagmcabs}{2}{tagmcid}{\__property_code_tagmcid: }}}
 ...\penalty 10000
+...\penalty 10000
 ...\pdflateliteral page{/P <</MCID \flag_height:n {__tag/mcid}\flag_raise:n {__tag/mcid} >> BDC}
 ...\marks4{b-,2,4,P,,,}
 ...\marks4{b+,2,4,P,,,}

testfiles-luatex/testauxtree.tlg

@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ Completed box being shipped out [1]
 ...\marks4{e+,1,3,}
 ...\write1{\new@label@record{mcid-2}{{tagabspage}{\__property_code_tagabspage: }{tagmcabs}{2}{tagmcid}{\__property_code_tagmcid: }}}
 ...\penalty 10000
+...\penalty 10000
 ...\pdflateliteral page{/P <</MCID \flag_height:n {__tag/mcid}\flag_raise:n {__tag/mcid} >> BDC}
 ...\marks4{b-,2,4,P,,,}
 ...\marks4{b+,2,4,P,,,}

testfiles-pdftex/test-get_role-20.tlg

@@ -17,10 +17,85 @@ l. ... }
 ============================================================
 TEST 3: get known role title, unknown name space
 ============================================================
-> \l_tmpa_tl=title.
+! Use of \__prop_get_linked:w doesn't match its definition.
+<recently read> \g__tag_role_NS_blub_prop 
+l. ... }
+If you say, e.g., `\def\a1{...}', then you must always
+put `1' after `\a', since control sequence names are
+made up of letters only. The macro here has not been
+followed by the required stuff, so I'm ignoring it.
+! Argument of \tl_set:Nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \tl_set:Nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_i:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_i:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_ii:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_ii:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+> \l_tmpa_tl={Span}{pdf}.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
-> \l_tmpb_tl=blub.
+> \l_tmpb_tl=.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
 ============================================================
@@ -37,20 +112,170 @@ l. ... }
 ============================================================
 TEST 5: get standard role: Sect
 ============================================================
-> \l_tmpa_tl=Sect.
+! Use of \__prop_get_linked:w doesn't match its definition.
+<recently read> \g__tag_role_NS_xxx_prop 
+l. ... }
+If you say, e.g., `\def\a1{...}', then you must always
+put `1' after `\a', since control sequence names are
+made up of letters only. The macro here has not been
+followed by the required stuff, so I'm ignoring it.
+! Argument of \tl_set:Nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \tl_set:Nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_i:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_i:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_ii:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_ii:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+> \l_tmpa_tl={Span}{pdf}.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
-> \l_tmpb_tl=xxx.
+> \l_tmpb_tl=.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
 ============================================================
 ============================================================
 TEST 6: get standard role: Aside
 ============================================================
-> \l_tmpa_tl=Aside.
+! Use of \__prop_get_linked:w doesn't match its definition.
+<recently read> \g__tag_role_NS_xxx_prop 
+l. ... }
+If you say, e.g., `\def\a1{...}', then you must always
+put `1' after `\a', since control sequence names are
+made up of letters only. The macro here has not been
+followed by the required stuff, so I'm ignoring it.
+! Argument of \tl_set:Nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \tl_set:Nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_i:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_i:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+! Missing number, treated as zero.
+<to be read again> 
+                   }
+l. ... }
+A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
+(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
+look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
+! Argument of \use_ii:nn has an extra }.
+<inserted text> 
+                \par 
+l. ... }
+I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
+For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
+this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
+I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
+argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
+your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
+Runaway argument?
+! Paragraph ended before \use_ii:nn was complete.
+<to be read again> 
+                   \par 
+l. ... }
+I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
+control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
+My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
+> \l_tmpa_tl={Span}{pdf}.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
-> \l_tmpb_tl=xxx.
+> \l_tmpb_tl=.
 <recently read> }
 l. ... }
 ============================================================