-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
openstack-cloud-controller-manager-binary does not show the correct release in OKD/OCP4.12+ #2623
Comments
I found the following command that gives sort-of a hunch which version currently is being used:
|
Kubernetes v0.0.0-master+$Format:%H$ I remember it's a known issue and somehow related to Cloud provider instead of OCCM |
I remember that I fixed this last year in #2252 I just checked the 1.30 release:
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?:
/kind bug
What happened:
The
openstack-cloud-controller-manager
binary in OKD 4.12(=free version of Openshift) does not show the correct git-release that is being used.# openstack-cloud-controller-manager --version
Kubernetes v0.0.0-master+$Format:%H$
What you expected to happen:
Since
openstack-cloud-controller-manager
is the out-of-tree provider of Openstack by default in OKD/OCP4.12+, it would be nice to see which version it is using. I for example want to use new functionality fromrelease-1.30
, but it looks like it is not available yet. Is there any other way to check which release I am on?Environment:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: