-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 350
v0.9 Release Blog
KubeArmor supports multiple modes of deployment today, including using manifests files, helm, and using karmor cli tool.
However, operator-based installation was desired for KubeArmor for the following reasons:
- To handle the scenario where the cluster contains multiple nodes supporting different LSM (Linux Security Modules). KubeArmor cannot set the AppArmor annotation in context to the workload deployed on the node not supporting AppArmor.
- There are certain services such as Kubearmor relay whose resource utilization depends on the number of nodes operating within the cluster.
Operator-based installation and subsequent monitoring simplify the handling of such scenarios.
With this release, the karmor cli tool or the helm/manifests will install the operator and then the operator will install the relevant Daemonset and services needed.
- Node: 4
- Platform - AKS
- Workload -> Sock-shop
- replica: 1
- Tool -> Apache-bench (request at front-end service)
- Vm: DS_v2
Vm | CPU | Ram | Data disks | Temp Storage |
---|---|---|---|---|
DS2_v2 | 2 | 7 GiB | 8 | 14 GiB |
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2205.502 | 0.4534 | 0 | 401.1 | 287.3333333 |
Readings
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2246.79 | 0.445 | 0 | 380 | 239 |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2187.22 | 0.457 | 0 | 378 | 358 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2244.16 | 0.446 | 0 | 451 | 258 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2213.37 | 0.452 | 0 | 351 | 304 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2131.19 | 0.469 | 0 | 380 | 251 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2215.89 | 0.451 | 0 | 400 | 326 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2172.19 | 0.46 | 0 | 428 | 332 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2195.73 | 0.455 | 0 | 444 | 240 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2206.41 | 0.453 | 0 | 385 | 278 |
no kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | - | - | 2242.07 | 0.446 | 0 | 414 | 318 |
Average | 2205.502 | 0.4534 | 0 | 401.1 | 287.3333333 |
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
with kubearmor | 50000 | 5000 | 144.7142857 | 109.9 | 2152.563 | 0.4645 | 0 | 456.4 | 394 |
Readings
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 138 | 108 | 2150.07 | 0.465 | 0 | 429 | 446 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 126 | 112 | 2177.17 | 0.459 | 0 | 479 | 408 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 125 | 112 | 2186.66 | 0.457 | 0 | 520 | 418 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 167 | 110 | 2141.53 | 0.467 | 0 | 466 | 417 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 139 | 111 | 2161.54 | 0.463 | 0 | 422 | 384 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 154 | 109 | 2117.48 | 0.472 | 0 | 505 | 344 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 164 | 112 | 2160.88 | 0.463 | 0 | 430 | 331 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 146 | 110 | 2112.76 | 0.473 | 0 | 453 | 450 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 131 | 106 | 2162.98 | 0.462 | 0 | 420 | 364 |
with kubearmor | 500000 | 5000 | 138 | 109 | 2154.56 | 0.464 | 0 | 440 | 378 |
Average | 144.7142857 | 109.9 | 2152.563 | 0.4645 | 0 | 456.4 | 394 |
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
with Policy | 50000 | 5000 | 141.2 | 111.9 | 2169.358 | 0.4609 | 0 | 438.2 | 435.1 |
Readings
Scenario | Requests | Concurrent Requests | Kubearmor CPU (m) | Kubearmor Memory (Mi) | Throughput (req/s) | Average time per req. (ms) | # Failed requests | Micro-service CPU (m) | Micro-service Memory (Mi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 131 | 113 | 2162.86 | 0.462 | 0 | 542 | 446 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 139 | 111 | 2190.72 | 0.456 | 0 | 457 | 458 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 145 | 112 | 2103.46 | 0.475 | 0 | 445 | 395 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 149 | 108 | 2155.55 | 0.464 | 0 | 440 | 454 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 129 | 113 | 2177.68 | 0.459 | 0 | 395 | 394 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 160 | 122 | 2198.53 | 0.455 | 0 | 435 | 503 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 156 | 117 | 2179.89 | 0.459 | 0 | 391 | 451 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 134 | 119 | 2196.78 | 0.455 | 0 | 408 | 429 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 129 | 114 | 2178.07 | 0.459 | 0 | 424 | 435 |
with Policy | 500000 | 5000 | 140 | 112 | 2150.04 | 0.465 | 0 | 445 | 386 |
Average | 141.2 | 111.9 | 2169.358 | 0.4609 | 0 | 438.2 | 435.1 |
Explain what changes had to be done? What Enforcement logic had to be used?
Multiple controllers such as policy-controller and host-policy-controller were separately installed. The new release consolidates multiple controllers into a single pod reducing the overall number of kubearmor pods deployed in the cluster.