You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using multiple runs of the same MCMC algorithm (and settings) with bounds, sometimes it will return a 0 acceptance rate and fail, while other runs will work as expected. Our hopeful use case would be to provide R wrappers to your fast MCMC samplers with custom bounded density functions, but the instability has us concerned.
To simplify the issue and provide a hopefully reproducible example, take the HMC example with Eigen in the package documentation. If bounds are added between 1.55 and 50 for both parameters, it fails >10% of the time. But when I increase the lower bound to 1.65, the algorithm almost always fails. Does this have to do with the step-size? Or am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using multiple runs of the same MCMC algorithm (and settings) with bounds, sometimes it will return a 0 acceptance rate and fail, while other runs will work as expected. Our hopeful use case would be to provide R wrappers to your fast MCMC samplers with custom bounded density functions, but the instability has us concerned.
To simplify the issue and provide a hopefully reproducible example, take the HMC example with Eigen in the package documentation. If bounds are added between 1.55 and 50 for both parameters, it fails >10% of the time. But when I increase the lower bound to 1.65, the algorithm almost always fails. Does this have to do with the step-size? Or am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: