Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expired certificate posts security risk to users of madoko local? #79

Open
tlyim opened this issue Feb 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

expired certificate posts security risk to users of madoko local? #79

tlyim opened this issue Feb 6, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@tlyim
Copy link

tlyim commented Feb 6, 2022

The server at www.madoko.net cannot be connected with https, apparently due to certificate expired.

This also affect the use of madoko local.

Without https connection, it's not clear if allowing access to local drive posts a significant security risk to a user.

Can you please have a look at the expired certificate issue? Many thanks.

@Edmond110
Copy link

I can confirm, @tlyim, that the certificate has expired, at least that is the message when madoko.net is visited in Chrome. Safari doesn't complain for whatever reason, I don't know. Madoko is a great tool — it would be nice to still have access to it, though I realize there are alternatives.

@tlyim
Copy link
Author

tlyim commented Jul 9, 2022

Thanks for your confirmation, @Edmond110 . Any alternative that you feel is worth a mention? Thanks.

@Edmond110
Copy link

The two alternatives I am looking at are Scrivomatic, which allows Scrivener to interact with Pandoc, and Quarto accessed via a plug-in for VS Code.

@tlyim
Copy link
Author

tlyim commented Aug 25, 2022

Thanks for your reply. I had a look at Quarto and explored how it can substitute the {.fragment} functionality of Madoko. In case anyone is interested, some workarounds are discussed in the pages below:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants