You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
I have a customer with an editor who previously deleted a news article which added an entry to the url tracker tabl. They later created the same news article with the exact same name in the exact same location but it was never accessible due to the previously inserted rule.
Should it be considered to remove any matching rules for removed nodes when a new node is created that would result in a url that matches one in the OldUrl column?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The 410 Gone entry is, in theory, only considered when no content is there to show, e.g. a 404 status.
Well, at least, this is how I originally built it, but I'm not sure if this is still the case after all these years ;-)
I'll need to see if I can recreate the issue then, perhaps it was a coincidence that it started working as expected after deleting the Url Tracker record. Also, in case it's of relevance this was on a load balanced site.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I have a customer with an editor who previously deleted a news article which added an entry to the url tracker tabl. They later created the same news article with the exact same name in the exact same location but it was never accessible due to the previously inserted rule.
Should it be considered to remove any matching rules for removed nodes when a new node is created that would result in a url that matches one in the
OldUrl
column?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: