Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accuracy #37

Open
JohnSundayBigChin opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Accuracy #37

JohnSundayBigChin opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@JohnSundayBigChin
Copy link

Hi, this is not really an issue, I just wanted to know why there are differences in the segmentation/masking/rotoscoping results between the published models run locally and the one obtained directly from the META page. Is it because of the model implementation, computing power or a Comfy UI limitation?

@kijai
Copy link
Owner

kijai commented Aug 25, 2024

There shouldn't be any differences (unless there's been an update) in the detection and the raw mask, however this node doesn't do any postprocessing, so the raw output isn't comparable to the official demo. There are other nodes that can do post processing, such as filling holes or smoothing the edges, for example my GrowMaskWithBlur.

@JohnSundayBigChin
Copy link
Author

Thanks for replying, I'm going to try that node now.
By the way, you've done an excellent job, much appreciated for sharing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants