Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RMLTC0007h: error expected? should be true in the metadata #38

Open
thomas-delva opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #67
Open

RMLTC0007h: error expected? should be true in the metadata #38

thomas-delva opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #67

Comments

@thomas-delva
Copy link

The test case description says an error should be thrown, and the CI tests reflect this as well, see here. But this is not reflected in the metadata.

This leads to an error in the test case report generator, see https://github.com/kg-construct/rml-test-cases-support/issues/9

I would propose to set error expected? to true for these cases
@arenas-guerrero-julian
Copy link

Also, it should not be rr:graph but rr:graphMap

dachafra added a commit to dachafra/rml-test-cases that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2022
@dachafra
solving issue kg-construct#38
01a424b
ghsnd pushed a commit to ghsnd/rml-test-cases that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2024
Fix RMLTC0007h
b90d505 
- Specify that it should throw an error (in metadata.csv).
- Use existing references in the mapping rules so that the real issue (generating a non-IRI graph) can be easily tested.
- Fixes kg-construct#38 kg-construct#58 kg-construct#13
@ghsnd ghsnd linked a pull request Nov 7, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix RMLTC0007h ghsnd/rml-test-cases
2 participants
@arenas-guerrero-julian @thomas-delva