Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Equality of Logical Source & Logical Target #79

Open
DylanVanAssche opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Equality of Logical Source & Logical Target #79

DylanVanAssche opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation proposal Proposal available for fixing this issue in the spec question Further information is requested working-group

Comments

@DylanVanAssche
Copy link
Collaborator

During the KGC W3C Community Group meetings it came to our attention that we need to specify when a Logical Source and Logical Target can be considered equal.

Equal logical sources, check the discussion in the PR
Discussing when a Logical Source is now the same: description 1-1 match or same identifier ^^^
For random generated sources, how to deal with that? Might be a job for the mapping writer.

Equal in programming language is that always the same? Are we sure of that?
Define independent of a programming language, but similar idea.

Characterizing sources → more general abstract 'you extract the same data' each time you access the source. You could do this to cache in RML Processor if the source is deterministic. Maybe add an option to a Source to make Processors aware of it.

@DylanVanAssche DylanVanAssche added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested working-group labels Jun 5, 2024
@DylanVanAssche DylanVanAssche added the proposal Proposal available for fixing this issue in the spec label Dec 11, 2024
@DylanVanAssche
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed in Ghent, proposal available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation proposal Proposal available for fixing this issue in the spec question Further information is requested working-group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant