You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not an easy one to solve. Shows up in the fastly fixture where pathItem keys end either {name} or {old_name}. If you replace each path template section with {0}, {1}, {2} etc and compare the resultant keys, duplicates are found.
A relative path to an individual endpoint. The field name MUST begin with a forward slash (/). The path is appended (no relative URL resolution) to the expanded URL from the Server Object's url field in order to construct the full URL. Path templating is allowed. When matching URLs, concrete (non-templated) paths would be matched before their templated counterparts. Templated paths with the same hierarchy but different templated names MUST NOT exist as they are identical
Some tools (cough) append a dummy fragment id to disambiguate equivalent pathItem keys.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is something we can actually detect while parsing. My initial thought was to emit a warning that it exists. Is it more surprising to have an auto-fix or to prompt for manual post-processing?
Not an easy one to solve. Shows up in the
fastly
fixture where pathItem keys end either {name} or {old_name}. If you replace each path template section with {0}, {1}, {2} etc and compare the resultant keys, duplicates are found.Some tools (cough) append a dummy fragment id to disambiguate equivalent pathItem keys.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: