Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MedusaConfigs should be namespace local #1266

Closed
3 tasks
Miles-Garnsey opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1267
Closed
3 tasks

MedusaConfigs should be namespace local #1266

Miles-Garnsey opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1267
Assignees
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Miles-Garnsey
Copy link
Member

What is missing?

Having MedusaConfigs in a namespace remote to the K8ssandraCluster causes a variety of issues around cleanup and complicates a variety of the orchestration of these objects. We should modify this functionality so that only namespace-local MedusaConfigs can be referenced within a K8ssandraCluster.

Definition of done

  • There is a new piece of functionality in the webhook which prevents creation of new K8ssandraClusters with a namespace field defined in the MedusaConfigRef ObjectReference field.
  • Release notes updated inc migration plan.
  • A finaliser is added to the MedusaConfig reference for every K8ssandraCluster that references it.
@Miles-Garnsey Miles-Garnsey added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 2, 2024
@Miles-Garnsey Miles-Garnsey changed the title MedusaConfigs should be namespace specific MedusaConfigs should be namespace local Apr 3, 2024
@Miles-Garnsey Miles-Garnsey moved this to Ready For Review in K8ssandra Apr 3, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added the ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' label Apr 3, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski moved this from Ready For Review to Review in K8ssandra Apr 4, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added review Issues in the state 'review' and removed ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Apr 4, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Done in K8ssandra Apr 16, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added done Issues in the state 'done' and removed review Issues in the state 'review' labels Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants