Vaillant d.29 diagnostic code PrimaryCircuitFlowRate query #1153
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
My new Ecotec plus 20kW (VU 20CS/1-5 (N-GB)) shows a flow of ~1500l/h on the boiler UI when the tank is being charged, the equivalent data that comes back on ebusd is "15.04" for example, the unit is quoted as "uin100" in the config file. I'm guessing that means multiply by 100?... which would then equal the boiler UI reading, just less than 0.5l/s. The Megaflo is close by, and on 22mm piping of course. The pump - ebusd "PumpPower" - is reported at 100%. When only radiators are on, the flow is 7 - 9 (15mm pipe, sounds right, about half x-section area), and 5 - 6 when the under floor only running. The latter is constrained by the manifold and the ability to consume energy, the pump drops to < 30% then, as does the modulation, and fan speed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all,
I have a recently installed v5 adapter and largely working HA integration due in no small part to the efforts of John and this community of course.
My objective has been to record time-series data for my new boiler - ideally as many of the diagnostic codes and other data as possible - which is a Vaillant 835 combination boiler, sold in the UK at least as the EcoTec 835 exclusive Green IQ 835 (VUW 356/5‐7 (H-GB)) and which presents on ebus as SW=0604 & HW=9102.
I've had a lot of what looks like successes but still a few queries/issues, so thought I'd start with what seems like a discrete query.
I am particularly interested in the HC flow rate as I have some concerns about the implementation of the wet side of set-up - in particularly whether the pipe sizings is causing velocity noises etc.
I've mapped d.29 (which I 'borrowed' from bai.0010003857.inc) to successfully retrieve data:
But two odd things - first, the results seem really high:
15 odd m3/h is about 4 l/s
Second, d.29 on the panel shows in l/h not m3/h and comparatively shows 874 l/h or about .24 l/s
Incidentally, .24 l/s converts to between about .8 m/s to 1.5 m/s depending on the pipe size so that would be fine by UK design standards for water velocity in HC pipework - 4 l/s would very much not be fine.
in the first instance, was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about why the units might differ from the bus message to the physical panel and why they might read what seems very high!
Any thoughts welcome!
Gareth
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions