From 5618ef78505a854bd0d2c145fd9cf7967226a20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aliaksey Kandratsenka <alkondratenko@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:31:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Don't assume memalign exists in memalign vs nallocx test

OSX and windows have issues with memalign. So test against tc_memalign
instead.

This should fix _memalign linker-time part of issue #870.
---
 src/tests/tcmalloc_unittest.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/tests/tcmalloc_unittest.cc b/src/tests/tcmalloc_unittest.cc
index f1ea00121..0bf18e78d 100644
--- a/src/tests/tcmalloc_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/tests/tcmalloc_unittest.cc
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static void TestNAllocXAlignment() {
       size_t rounded = nallocx(size, MALLOCX_LG_ALIGN(align));
       ASSERT_GE(rounded, size);
       ASSERT_EQ(rounded % (1 << align), 0);
-      void* ptr = memalign(1 << align, size);
+      void* ptr = tc_memalign(1 << align, size);
       ASSERT_EQ(rounded, MallocExtension::instance()->GetAllocatedSize(ptr));
       free(ptr);
     }