Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit flag description and docs #2113

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023
Merged

Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit flag description and docs #2113

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

sverdlov93
Copy link
Contributor

  • All tests have passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, new tests have been added.
  • The pull request is targeting the dev branch.
  • The code has been validated to compile successfully by running go vet ./....
  • The code has been formatted properly using go fmt ./....

@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 added the ignore for release Automatically generated release notes label Aug 3, 2023
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 requested a review from eyalbe4 August 3, 2023 16:36
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 changed the title Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit command flag description Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit command flag description and docs Aug 3, 2023
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 changed the title Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit command flag description and docs Remove yarn 2+ restriction from audit flag description and docs Aug 3, 2023
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 merged commit a562e28 into dev Aug 3, 2023
1 check failed
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 deleted the sverdlov93-patch-1 branch August 3, 2023 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 eyalbe4 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ignore for release Automatically generated release notes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sverdlov93 @eyalbe4