Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration tests for Advanced Security #2037

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

orto17
Copy link
Contributor

@orto17 orto17 commented Jun 22, 2023

  • All tests passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, I added new tests.
  • All static analysis checks passed.
  • This pull request is on the dev branch.
  • I used gofmt for formatting the code before submitting the pull request.

@orto17 orto17 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jun 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jun 22, 2023
@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 self-requested a review June 22, 2023 14:58
@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 added the ignore for release Automatically generated release notes label Jun 22, 2023
@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 changed the title Jas Flow Integration Test Integration tests for Advanced Security Jul 20, 2023
@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 20, 2023
xray_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 560 to 562
for _, vuln := range results.Vulnerabilities {
assert.NotEmpty(t, vuln.Applicable)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't be better to move this loop into the above if statement?

xray_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 167 to 177
//func TestXrayAuditJasSimpleJson(t *testing.T) {
// output := testXrayAuditJas(t, string(utils.SimpleJson), "jas")
// verifySimpleJsonScanResults(t, output, 0, 0, 1, 1)
// verifySimpleJsonJasResults(t, output, 3, 2)
//}
//
//func TestXrayAuditJasNoViolationsSimpleJson(t *testing.T) {
// output := testXrayAuditJas(t, string(utils.SimpleJson), "npm")
// verifySimpleJsonScanResults(t, output, 0, 0, 1, 1)
// verifySimpleJsonJasResults(t, output, 0, 0)
//}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's uncomment the above tests.

@eyalbe4 eyalbe4 self-requested a review July 20, 2023 14:30
@orto17 orto17 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@orto17 orto17 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@orto17 orto17 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@orto17 orto17 added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Jul 23, 2023
@sverdlov93 sverdlov93 closed this Aug 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore for release Automatically generated release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants