Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ansible/artifactory] Support RHEL 9 in rabbitmq setup #354

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

dmosen
Copy link
Contributor

@dmosen dmosen commented Dec 16, 2023

PR Checklist

[Place an '[x]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.]

  • Title of the PR starts with installer/product name (e.g. [ansible/artifactory])
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
  • Variables and other changes are documented in the README.md

What this PR does / why we need it:

This adds support for EL9 distros (e.g. RHEL 9 and CentOS 9). Without this fix, Xray installation fails on EL 9 distributions because it attempts to install incompatible RPM packages for socat and erlang.

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@dmosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

dmosen commented Dec 16, 2023

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@dmosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

dmosen commented Dec 16, 2023

recheck

@chukka chukka changed the title [ansible/artifactory] Support el9 in rabbitmq setup [ansible/artifactory] Support RHEL 9 in rabbitmq setup May 12, 2024
@chukka chukka changed the base branch from master to jp-10.18.0 May 13, 2024 04:11
@chukka chukka merged commit f189b46 into jfrog:jp-10.18.0 May 13, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants