From 10abec77f4af9937324109787aad114deb0b25c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Parsons Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:55:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Additional post edits --- .vscode/settings.json | 1 + .../2023/2023-02-16-is-the-living-computer-museum-dead.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.vscode/settings.json b/.vscode/settings.json index e1a32eb5a..78848f890 100644 --- a/.vscode/settings.json +++ b/.vscode/settings.json @@ -1556,6 +1556,7 @@ "LIVEDUMP", "LIVEMEM", "LIVEREGS", + "livingcomputers", "LLBAR", "LLDT", "LLIST", diff --git a/blog/_posts/2023/2023-02-16-is-the-living-computer-museum-dead.md b/blog/_posts/2023/2023-02-16-is-the-living-computer-museum-dead.md index dc838ddc2..6f506fd3a 100644 --- a/blog/_posts/2023/2023-02-16-is-the-living-computer-museum-dead.md +++ b/blog/_posts/2023/2023-02-16-is-the-living-computer-museum-dead.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Note one sentence in particular: > The Living Computer Museum also fulfills my hope that the achievements of early computer engineers **aren't lost to time**. -It's difficult to imagine that Paul Allen, after investing so much time, energy, and money in the Living Computer Museum and its people -- not to mention his *express hope* that efforts like his would not be "lost to time" -- would have also left instructions to liquidate LCM after his death. +It's unfortunate that Paul Allen, after investing so much time, energy, and money in the Living Computer Museum and its people -- not to mention his *express hope* that efforts like his would not be "lost to time" -- didn't ensure that the museum would continue after his death. It makes sense for some of Paul Allen's acquisitions, like his recently auctioned [art collection](https://www.christies.com/en/events/visionary-the-paul-g-allen-collection/overview), to find their way into new hands after he's gone. Items like artwork are always changing hands.