You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current draft still contains this sentence in the POS section:
This syntax for circles and polygons is in the same style as STC-S, but with no reference positions, coordinate systems, units, or geometric operators (union, intersection, not).
This is a very large "but", to the point where the reference to STC-S seems misleading. Probably this should point to DALI's shape instead? It seems most likely that DALI 1.2 will get done before DAP, so can we just change this now in the draft?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think WD-DALI-1.2 can come close to completely replacing any need or reference to STC-S and POS could be defined with reference to DALI (xtype="shape"). And yes, we need to do this cleanly and asap.
The current draft still contains this sentence in the POS section:
This is a very large "but", to the point where the reference to STC-S seems misleading. Probably this should point to DALI's
shape
instead? It seems most likely that DALI 1.2 will get done before DAP, so can we just change this now in the draft?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: