All annotations on unidancing competitions rules
- prerequisite to understand the backgroup: Freestyle structure
- Rules are neither correct, finished nor formulated fully by purpose. For now it is the idea behind that.
Formulate rules in detail or general. Both has pros and cons.
| Pro | Contra |
|---|---|
| bigger and more flexible [german: Wertungsbereich] | Too detailed, some may be missed |
| Longer judging times | |
| High requirement on judges |
| Pro | Contra |
|---|---|
| Fast judging | Not all details may be in a routine |
| Low requirement on judges | If details are choosen wrong, others - maybe important ones, stay untouched. |
Marie: Relationship to the amount of tricks not given. One trick with difficulty and quality of 10 will do the job.
Best reference to quality is the Skilltester It is important to mention, that the arms positions are for practice, which will be different from those used in a routine. If they are still of high quality, enter those that bring the best score for practice.
Are the weight for the deducations (0.25 to 0.75) in the correct relationship?
-> Testcase
Currently the deductions are removed from a maximum number instead of from the amount of tricks.
-> Testcase
The checklist for choreography is very detailed. Do these values have a real relation to what's choreography?
-> Collect experience
Scientic background is missing to fully understand body language and to help make the rules more understandable and deliver better explanations.
-> Research
Descriptions for good and bad quality are sloppy yet. Research for better ones.
-> Research