fix(j-s): Police case number in robot e-mail #17218
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
warning [email protected]: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)Pattern
🔇 Additional comments (1)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)
The change simplifies the code by directly modifying Let's verify that this is the only occurrence of police case number sanitization in the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulPolice case number sanitization is consistently implemented across the codebase The verification shows that the police case number sanitization (removing dashes) is consistently implemented:
The change aligns with the existing codebase patterns and maintains consistency in police case number handling. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of police case number sanitization
rg -l "policeCaseNumber.*replace\(-"
Length of output: 38 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for police case number sanitization patterns
rg -i "policecasenumber.*replace"
# Also search for any string replacements with dash
rg "replace\(/-/g"
# Let's also check for similar variable names
rg -i "sanitizedpolicecasenumber"
Length of output: 3227 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
unakb
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 95 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 87 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3) |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17218 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 35.75% 35.76% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6935 6931 -4
Lines 148076 147984 -92
Branches 42214 42168 -46
==========================================
- Hits 52946 52932 -14
+ Misses 95130 95052 -78
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
What
Fix stringified variable name for police case number
Why
Because the robot expects it to be called policeCaseNumber not sanitizedPoliceCaseNumber
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores