We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Calling commitments endpoint with transaction Id instead of commitment id still resolves to a slot commitment instead of failing. example:
tx id: 0x5f73f9666cc25bbbf553d71ff73034a61cb3f089214ff530c5b2909f35fce341ed680000 https://chronicle.iota2-alphanet.iotaledger.net/api/core/v3/commitments/0x5f73f9666cc25bbbf553d71ff73034a61cb3f089214ff530c5b2909f35fce341ed680000 response: {"protocolVersion":3,"slot":26861,"previousCommitmentId":"0xfa247cd020b6a16536c4297eb06cbc6d49e9e21f3c0e3140a760b72b54de5245ec680000","rootsId":"0xd211d5cc1771de46ff023bce993c8e5a90f4101f5451d9b95d7d38abab240780","cumulativeWeight":"428823","referenceManaCost":"1"}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Alex6323
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Bug description
Calling commitments endpoint with transaction Id instead of commitment id still resolves to a slot commitment instead of failing.
example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: