Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] Deploy CRI-RM as DaemonSet instead of systemd.unit #12

Open
ppalucki opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[Proposal] Deploy CRI-RM as DaemonSet instead of systemd.unit #12

ppalucki opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@ppalucki
Copy link
Contributor

ppalucki commented Aug 18, 2022

Not sure is it possible, to have fully functional CRI-RM running as privileged container with access to nessesary hosts path and there can be some issues unix socket connectivity between host kubelet and CRI-resource-manager running as pod.

Pros:

  • simplified deployment
  • access to logs
  • "cloud native"

Cons:

  • Egg and chicken problem when installation fails to restart kubelet
  • Risk of limited host access by CRI-resource-manager for "future/unknown" policies

Note: not new idea, closed PR in cri-resource-manager can be found here: intel/cri-resource-manager#55

@ppalucki ppalucki added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 18, 2022
@ppalucki ppalucki added this to the future/undecided milestone Aug 30, 2022
@ppalucki ppalucki added the question Further information is requested label Oct 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant