You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When updating the version of this gem to 5.1.2, it appears as though quite a few zip codes where removed. Doing
select count(*) from zip_codes
5.1.1 gives us 40998 codes, 5.1.2 gives us 39211.
Not sure how many examples it would take, but one we've found is "12345" which does appear to be a valid code. I'm not 100% sure of the source of the data, otherwise we'd try to fix, but this appears to have been introduced a couple day ago in 35c7e48.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Interesting, so my assumption that 12345 is a valid ZIP is not actually true. I just found what appears to be a canonical list of ZIP codes at least via USPS, and 12345 is not present. That being said, there are currently 44196 records, I'm curious as to the difference here.
From my limited understanding, 12345 is a valid delivery ZIP code. It is row 560 on the "Unique-ZIP_DETAIL" sheet.
The reason why the counts are not matching between this project and USPS is because USPS has duplicates. I guess this means the mail can be routed to more-than-one post office.
When updating the version of this gem to 5.1.2, it appears as though quite a few zip codes where removed. Doing
5.1.1 gives us
40998
codes, 5.1.2 gives us39211
.Not sure how many examples it would take, but one we've found is "12345" which does appear to be a valid code. I'm not 100% sure of the source of the data, otherwise we'd try to fix, but this appears to have been introduced a couple day ago in 35c7e48.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: