You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wanted to open this to ensure awareness and have it tracked.
The core package requires nprogress which seems more or less abandoned. The last 0.2.0 release on npm was 9 years ago.
4 years ago there was an attempt to release 1.0.0, which was tagged on GitHub but never made it as "latest" to npm.
Issues and merge requests are ignored; new packages spammed.
Not sure how I feel about such a dependency in general. Additionally, not everyone needs progress bars. And support for the navigation api (native spinners, yay!) in all major browsers seems only months away.🤏
I was wondering if Inertia v2 would be a good moment to drop mentioned dependency and make it (and it's Inertia wrapper) optional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also many UI packages already include their own progress bar.
Good point! And who still really wants it from Inertia can use the core-independent inertiajs/progress with no hustle (but still stuck on the abandoned nprogress).
NickSdot
changed the title
Should nprogress remain a dependency?
[2.x] Should nprogress remain a dependency?
Oct 18, 2024
I wanted to open this to ensure awareness and have it tracked.
The core package requires
nprogress
which seems more or less abandoned. The last 0.2.0 release on npm was 9 years ago.4 years ago there was an attempt to release 1.0.0, which was tagged on GitHub but never made it as "latest" to npm.
Issues and merge requests are ignored; new packages spammed.
Not sure how I feel about such a dependency in general. Additionally, not everyone needs progress bars. And support for the navigation api (native spinners, yay!) in all major browsers seems only months away.🤏
I was wondering if Inertia v2 would be a good moment to drop mentioned dependency and make it (and it's Inertia wrapper) optional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: