You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
in this case this is due to Taxon match higherrank
The record can be matched to the GBIF taxonomic backbone at a higher rank, but not with the scientific name given. Reasons include: The name is new, and not available in the taxonomic datasets yet. The name is missing in the backbone's taxonomic sources for others reasons.
Suggested fix
Can the source/r/check_presence.R be edited to search based on GBIF occurrences, with the added criteria of Basis of record which needs to be Human Observation or Machine Observation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
species
Not present according to GBIF in Europe
seems to contain false positives that actually have been detected in Europe beforeExample
Schoenitemnus minutus
If you check GBIF (https://www.gbif.org/search?q=Schoenitemnus%20minutus), it seems that the species name is not in the GBIF database (species is empty). However when you check the occurences, there are many
Human observation
occurrences from Europein this case this is due to
Taxon match higherrank
Suggested fix
source/r/check_presence.R
be edited to search based on GBIF occurrences, with the added criteria ofBasis of record
which needs to beHuman Observation
orMachine Observation
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: