Automated Issue on branch feature/admin-notificacion

[CodeWatchdog]

journey
title Scores History
section 849dd002c1a3dd726ddfdc22b1edd15feafbd7cd
message: 2: luzmagurzua
vulnerability: 4: luzmagurzua

section 5b30f97b02b19697d53e2953d2c0a9c04d93cc2b
message: 3: luzmagurzua
vulnerability: 4: luzmagurzua

Loading

[CodeWatchdog]

Commit Review Summary [849dd00]

Author	Provided Message	Generated Message	Adherence Score	Comment
@luzmagurzua	'fix: notificacion'	'Refactor notification components'	2 😔	The provided message 'fix: notificacion' lacks specificity and does not clearly convey the nature of the changes. It does not follow best practices for commit messages, which should be descriptive and indicate the scope of changes. A better message could be 'Refactor notification components' to more accurately reflect the extensive structural and functional changes made to the notification system.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment

The changes involve significant refactoring and addition of new components for handling different types of notifications (individual, georeferenced, selective). The complexity arises from the introduction of multiple new states and handlers, which enhances functionality but could impact readability and maintenance if not well-documented. Consider breaking down complex functions into smaller, more manageable parts and provide comments or documentation to explain intricate logic, especially around the filtering and selection mechanisms.

Code Vulnerability

Score	Comment
4 😄	No immediate security vulnerabilities were detected in the changes. Input handling appears sufficiently sanitized for the scope of UI components, and the use of React's state management does not introduce apparent risks. However, ensure any backend interactions (not shown here) validate inputs server-side to prevent potential injection attacks (CWE-20: Improper Input Validation).

SOLID Principles

Principle	Score	Comment
Singleresponsibility	4 😄	The refactoring aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle by introducing components like 'IndividualNotification', 'GeoreferencedNotification', etc., each handling a specific type of notification. This separation improves maintainability. Ensure each component remains focused on its core purpose without accumulating additional responsibilities.
Openclosed	3 😐	The current structure is open to extensions by adding new notification types as separate components. However, changes to the main Notification component might be needed to integrate new types, which slightly violates the Open/Closed Principle. Consider using a more flexible design pattern like strategy or factory to add new types without modifying existing code.
Liskovsubstitution	4 😄	The use of individual components for various notification types does not involve inheritance, thus Liskov Substitution Principle is not directly applicable. The components are substitutable in the sense that they follow a consistent API structure, which is beneficial.
Interfacesegregation	4 😄	Interfaces, in the form of component props, are specific to each notification component. This adheres to the Interface Segregation Principle as each component only requires the props essential to its function. Ensure props remain minimal and focused on the component's needs.
Dependencyinversion	3 😐	The components depend directly on React's state and props, which is typical in a React application but does not fully leverage Dependency Inversion. Consider using context or hooks to abstract data handling and allow for easier testing and integration, thereby enhancing flexibility and adherence to the principle.

[CodeWatchdog]

Commit Review Summary [5b30f97]

Author	Provided Message	Generated Message	Adherence Score	Comment
@luzmagurzua	'fix: notificacion'	'Update notification UI and remove assets'	3 😐	The user-suggested message 'fix: notificacion' lacks clarity and detail. It does not specify what was fixed or changed. A better message should mention the specific changes, such as updating the notification UI and removing unused assets. This would provide more context and be more informative. Moreover, using a conventional commit format is good practice, but it should be more descriptive.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment

The code changes primarily involve UI updates and minor logic adjustments. The addition of multiple tags for spacing may clutter the JSX. Consider using CSS for spacing adjustments to improve readability and maintainability. Removing binary files reduces the codebase size, which is beneficial. The refactoring of the day selection logic is well-organized but could benefit from extracting it into a separate component to reduce complexity in the main component.

Code Vulnerability

Score	Comment
4 😄	No significant vulnerabilities were introduced in this commit. The changes are mostly UI-related, involving markup and styling adjustments. However, ensure input fields have proper validation and sanitation to prevent issues like XSS. While this is not directly related to the current changes, it's a good practice to maintain throughout the codebase.

SOLID Principles

Principle	Score	Comment
Singleresponsibility	3 😐	The component handles multiple responsibilities, including rendering UI elements and handling state changes. Consider refactoring some parts, like the day selection logic, into smaller, self-contained components to adhere to the SRP.
Openclosed	4 😄	The changes make the codebase more flexible, allowing modifications through configuration rather than code changes. However, further abstraction could be beneficial for future extensions, like integrating different notification types.
Liskovsubstitution	5 😍	There are no inheritance hierarchies in the current diff, so LSP is not directly applicable. However, the component structure allows for potential subclassing without breaking functionality.
Interfacesegregation	3 😐	The component interfaces could be more granular. Currently, it seems to handle too many concerns. Breaking down the component further could help in achieving better adherence to the ISP.
Dependencyinversion	3 😐	The current implementation tightly couples UI logic with component state. Introducing more abstraction layers or using hooks for external dependencies could improve flexibility and testability, better aligning with DIP.