Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated Issue on branch features/filtros #39

Open
CodeWatchdog opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Automated Issue on branch features/filtros #39

CodeWatchdog opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@CodeWatchdog
Copy link

CodeWatchdog commented Nov 19, 2024

journey
title Scores History
section f8fe6566a56171302d3586101515783483f77829
message: 2: JaviL13
vulnerability: 4: JaviL13

Loading
@CodeWatchdog
Copy link
Author

Commit Review Summary [f8fe656]

Author Provided Message Generated Message Adherence Score Comment
@JaviL13 'ajuste paramentros' 'Adjust filter distance parameters' 2 😔 The user-suggested message 'ajuste paramentros' is vague and contains a typo ('paramentros' should be 'parámetros'). It lacks specificity regarding what parameters were adjusted. A more precise message like 'Adjust filter distance parameters' clearly communicates what was changed and why, improving clarity and relevance.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment
The code complexity is low. The change involves updating the minimum and maximum values for distance-related functions and properties in a filter component. These changes are straightforward and do not introduce any complex logic. The readability is good due to the clear naming of functions and variables. There are no apparent side effects, as the changes strictly modify the range values for distance filtering.

Code Vulnerability

Score Comment
4 😄 No vulnerabilities were detected in the diff. The changes are confined to parameter adjustments and do not involve user inputs or data processing that could introduce security risks. The modifications are safe in terms of buffer overflow or improper input validation issues, as they strictly deal with predefined numeric ranges.

SOLID Principles

Principle Score Comment
Singleresponsibility 5 😍 The changes adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle. The modifications are focused on adjusting the distance parameters within the filter component, which is its sole responsibility. This ensures that the component remains focused on its intended function.
Openclosed 4 😄 The component is open for extension but closed for modification regarding its core functionality. While the range values were changed, they could be made configurable in the future to enhance extensibility without modifying the component's code.
Liskovsubstitution 5 😍 There are no inheritance or subclass issues present in the diff. The changes do not affect substitutability, as the component's interface remains consistent and unchanged.
Interfacesegregation 5 😍 The component adheres to the Interface Segregation Principle. It provides specific functions and does not require clients to implement unused methods. The changes do not introduce broader interfaces.
Dependencyinversion 3 😐 The code does not exhibit any issues with dependency inversion, but it also doesn't take advantage of it. Consider using interfaces or config objects to inject parameters like ranges, which could make the component more flexible and decoupled from specific value dependencies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants