From 2f647c52a543212a58ae51f9c3d3b5874326eb56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fridolin Glatter <glatter@iiasa.ac.at>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:13:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix passing kwargs to _uncached_request

---
 ixmp4/conf/manager.py | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ixmp4/conf/manager.py b/ixmp4/conf/manager.py
index e7d125b6..13a7da50 100644
--- a/ixmp4/conf/manager.py
+++ b/ixmp4/conf/manager.py
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ def _uncached_request(
         self,
         method: str,
         path: str,
+        params: dict[str, int | None] | None = None,
+        json: dict[str, Any] | list[Any] | tuple[Any] | None = None,
         jti: str | None = None,
     ) -> dict[str, Any]:
         del jti
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ def _uncached_request(
         # NOTE: since this cache is not shared amongst processes, it's efficacy
         # declines with the scale of the whole infrastructure unless counteracted
         # with increased cache size / memory usage
-        res = self.client.request(method, path)
+        res = self.client.request(method, path, params=params, json=json)
         if res.status_code != 200:
             raise ManagerApiError(f"[{str(res.status_code)}] {res.text}")
         # TODO Can we really assume this type?