Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is pk useful in RateLimit-Policy field? #135

Open
darrelmiller opened this issue Oct 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Is pk useful in RateLimit-Policy field? #135

darrelmiller opened this issue Oct 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@darrelmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Although the draft currently suggests it is supported https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers-08#section-3.1.4 upon further reflection I do not believe it is useful. It is also harmful in that it would negatively effect the benefits of HPACK compression.

I think it is only useful on the RateLimit field

@kevinswiber
Copy link

@darrelmiller This was my first thought upon reading the spec. However, I think it might be useful in RateLimit-Policy if the server knows up-front what the partition keys are and how different policies might apply to each. Admittedly, this would be communicating a fairly complex policy to the client, and it's exhaustively informative. Still, I think there's value.

@darrelmiller darrelmiller moved this to In Discussion in HttpApi Active Issues Nov 3, 2024
@darrelmiller darrelmiller moved this from In Discussion to Seeking Feedback in HttpApi Active Issues Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Seeking Feedback
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants