-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Add CI-specific view #340
Comments
☝️ CC @iFixit/qae |
@danielbeardsley do you want to see this implemented particularly on |
Is this what you're looking for? https://metabase.ifixit.com/dashboard/47-ci-status It's broken since we stopped writing to ifixit I believe. |
Yeah. We have all the data right there in the browser in the pull objects and it's live / kept up to date. |
FYI, we have all the merged pulls from the last two weeks on the client side: https://github.com/iFixit/pulldasher/blob/master/app.js#L50-L58 So all the data is there. |
Cool! Sounds good to me 👍 |
FYI we already have a grafana chart with the phpunit data (unit, integration, api, chrome): https://dashboards.cominor.com/d/ATRAxhR4k/ci-status?orgId=1 |
QAE doesn't plan on doing this any time soon. Pulling it off of our backlog. |
I made a proof-of-concept in a branch: But then I remembered that we only include CI runs / checks for the most recent commit of each pull. This definitely limits its usefulness because it doesn't represent the collection of recent runs but the collection of runs on recent commits. It may still help answer the question: "Of the CI blocked pulls, which statuses are causing the blocks" |
Problem
I often want to see the ~10 or so recent runs of a certain CI status to see if problems are isolated to a particular pull, or if it's a system-wide failure
Potential Solution
A view that shows a table of CI runs where the rows are pulls and the columns are CI statuses, click the column headers to sort the pulls by when that CI status was finished (or started?)
Another option would be to only show one status at a time and have the rows be pulls and the columns be:
This seems a bit more focused
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: