You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Studying the property sto:relatedTo I found out that according to the resources where the relations themselve are described (wiki, dbpedia, official pages), relations can be of very different types. Below you can find the list of relation that were identified manualy:
sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131
sto:IEC_62264 isBasedOn sto:ISA-95
sto:W3C_OWL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF
sto:W3C_SPARQL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF
sto:IEC_61511 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "process")
sto:IEC_62061 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "manufacturing/machineries")
sto:IEC_61360 usesSameDatamodelAs sto:ISO_13584
sto:W3C_RIF isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"
sto:W3C_OWL isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"
In the STO, the property relatedTois described as symmetric and transitive one but if we'll look at the identified relations, i.e. isBasedOn, we can see that this property is clearly not symmetric (sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131 is True but sto:IEC_61131 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61499 is False).
I believe that a more specific interpretation of the property sto:relatedTo can help us in constructing the landscape.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131 (second sentence from the top) sto:IEC_62264 isBasedOn sto:ISA-95 (second sentence from the top)
sto:W3C_OWL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF (can't remember now, might be just general knowledge)
sto:W3C_SPARQL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF (can't remember now, might be just general knowledge)
Studying the property
sto:relatedTo
I found out that according to the resources where the relations themselve are described (wiki, dbpedia, official pages), relations can be of very different types. Below you can find the list of relation that were identified manualy:In the STO, the property
relatedTo
is described as symmetric and transitive one but if we'll look at the identified relations, i.e.isBasedOn
, we can see that this property is clearly not symmetric (sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131
is True butsto:IEC_61131 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61499
is False).I believe that a more specific interpretation of the property
sto:relatedTo
can help us in constructing the landscape.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: